How to Kill a Movement

During the course of reading about church history and the great revivals, I have noticed a pattern. It seems that every time a mighty work of God breaks out, it just erupts and lays havoc to the hearts of men…all in a good way, of course. You can’t pinpoint its movements or what precisely sets it off. You can find some key principles that encouraged it to happen however. Dan Hayes outlines them in his book, Fireseeds of Spiritual Awakening. He says that God's people must:
- recognize a desperate need for spiritual awakening
- humble themselves before Him
- confess their sin and repent
- continually and earnestly pray
- call others to join with them to meet these prerequisites
On the other hand, I find it less difficult to see what slows the movement and eventually halts it dead in its tracks. That something: our own structure.
We love the wild outbreak of revival. It’s like entering a dark forest and encountering a savage lion. The rush captivates us as we watch him tear through the thick jungle in search of prey. We bring a few people to see him at work. They too are captivated and bring others.
Then, someone has the wonderfully fancy idea of catching the lion and bringing him into town for all to see. “Hey, we could even take the lion around the world!” someone exclaims. Thus, the fearsome lion from the dark and dangerous jungle settles for the cool clean cage and hearty steaks of the lion tamer. Although it took a little effort to cage the lion, the transition to domesticated life happened rather smoothly.
We take him around to all the towns nearby. At first, people “oohh” and “aahh” in amazement. But gradually, the wildness of the lion seems to fade and the interest of the people wanes. Someone says, “The lion deserves something bigger! Let’s build a magnificent structure for him and add some other elements to entertain the people.”
Well, you see where I’m headed. In my simplistic analogy, I simply draw attention to our need to “cage” the beast. In our sincere desire to help others experience a great movement, we often smother it with structure.
German church researcher Christian Schwarz says, "We can learn about the church by carefully pondering and analyzing the lilies - how they grow. The growth of plants and other living organisms reveal that they have a 'biotic' potential, the inherent capacity of an organism or species to survive and reproduce. This type of natural growth is not mechanical or artificial. It is God-given."
Don Hayes shared his prerequisites for spiritual revival at a large Campus Crusade for Christ fall conference in California back in 1984. Although hundreds of university students attended, only eight men came from UCLA. Those men, however, took what they had heard to heart. They returned to campus and committed themselves to pray daily for revival no matter how long it took.
Well, it didn't take long. More people began to come to their humble prayer meetings. Many began joining Bible studies and other gatherings. Just a short six months later they had over 100 students attend a spring conference.
The ministry saw dramatic growth for the next few years, but the growth soon dwindled away. In a parenthetical statement, Hayes recounts his questioning of a Campus Crusade staff member several years later. He asked what caused the awakening to die down after three years. The staff member replied, "No question about it. We began to over-organize God's work."
I wonder how many of us could say the same thing about the times we have seen God move in mighty ways. I wonder what the Church might look like if she weren't dressed in a large sanctuary accessorized by the ministry professionals' sermons and tools. Hmmm...


5 comments:
Joe - great words on Killing a Movement with too much structure. Structure is a funny thing; it is like blood pressure. One can die from too low or too high; either way you're still dead. It's always incumbent on leaders to monitor the right pressure range and continually PRUNE OUT structures that are no longer necessary for the next phase of growth. That's where I see the church fail - keeping old structures alive for too long.
NB: Last week we took the family out to Cocoa Beach, Florida. It happened to be a couple of days after the space shuttle launch. We saw two NASA boats hauling the booster rockets back in from the open sea. I think the boosters only remain attached to the shuttle for about 60-90 seconds during lift off, then they are jettisoned. The church - and CCC - could learn a few lessons from that principle.
Agreed! Usually when a movement breaks out there is very little structure. The problem seems to lie in us trying to funnel the front edge of the movement into a structure that we think will help benefit the movement. That usually slows it or kills it completely.
But we can help the movement if we encourage the organic process. That's where it gets tricky.
If I bunch of wild lilies sprang up in my yard, I wouldn't really need to do anything immediately to help more grow, as they do that naturally. In fact, my attempts to do so may disrupt the organic process. However, if the flowers begin to wilt in the heat of summer, I would do well to begin a process of watering and caring for them.
But I have to use very tender care. If my "caring" for them means transplanting them into a nice pattern that I want, I'm probably going to kill a bunch.
Joe,
Real quick that is Dan Hayes. I'll read the rest. Going to hang with the wifey.
steve
Structure? yes, we need it. I know you can't believe it is coming from me. But is structure that is built on a value system that doesn't look like structure. You know the endo-skeleton and exo-skeleton ideas. One you see the skin and muscles of the body and the other you see the bones. One seems cold and hard and the other alive, soft and warm. The problem is as Ken says, we have a structure that defines us and keeps us on a certain way of living and knowing Jesus. Instead of having Jesus be that source and the structure we have is just seeing him, responding to Him, letting Him, the H.S. and the word be our guide. The structure is letting things grow and maybe even die.
In your lillies example. Maybe the intrinsic purpose of those plants are to come and give joy for a season and then die. If our goal is to let them birth wildly and with little care and control then let it happen. That is your structure and value system.
If our goal is to keep them alive for ever than we'll build a system/structure for living that do just that. We'll keep them alive but new ones won't grow b/c we spend too much time on keeping the other ones alive.
So be the church. If our goal is to keep a specific church or movement alive in its current form then we'll spend all our resources to do just that. If our goal is to launch new churches or movements and have them multiply wildy and naturally then we'll spend our resources and time on that. The first generation may die but in the process they planted many more movements. That is the beauty of having that type of structure. More growth verses extended growth.
Very well said Steve, as usual! Your comment makes me think of our great fears, even my own sometimes, of letting things die. We forget that part of the natural process includes decline and eventual death. We put too many churches on life-support systems that eat up lots of resources. We perpetually view decline and death as omens of something wrong.
At the same time, we view health as perpetual growth. Does anything in our natural environment ever continually grow (physically) in a healthy way? Most growth that happens after a certain stage of life is actually unhealthy. We rarely address that topic.
Post a Comment